* Step 1: WeightGap WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Strict TRS:
            f(g(x),y,y) -> g(f(x,x,y))
        - Signature:
            {f/3} / {g/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g}
    + Applied Processor:
        WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = UArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny}
    + Details:
        The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation:
          We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
          The following argument positions are considered usable:
            uargs(g) = {1}
          
          Following symbols are considered usable:
            all
          TcT has computed the following interpretation:
            p(f) = [8] x1 + [0]
            p(g) = [1] x1 + [1]
          
          Following rules are strictly oriented:
          f(g(x),y,y) = [8] x + [8]
                      > [8] x + [1]
                      = g(f(x,x,y))
          
          
          Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
          
        Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition.
* Step 2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
    + Considered Problem:
        - Weak TRS:
            f(g(x),y,y) -> g(f(x,x,y))
        - Signature:
            {f/3} / {g/1}
        - Obligation:
            innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g}
    + Applied Processor:
        EmptyProcessor
    + Details:
        The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).

WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))